The thesis that common moral agreement among most all cultures
Thesearguments invoked competing ethical principles and led to conflictingconclusions, the thesis that common moral agreement among most all cultures they all had one thing in common: all of them assumed that there was just one right answerto the ethical question at issue. Inother words, they all assumed that there was objective moral truth. Now we will consider some challenges to thisnotion. The first of these is CulturalRelativism.Cultures differ with respect to what is deemedmorally acceptable. We recommend you try the latest version of one of these browsers. Louis P. There is an even more basic problem with the notion that morality depends on cultural acceptance for its validity.
The problem is that the notion of a culture is notoriously difficult to define, especially in a pluralistic society like our own where the notion Moral RelativismMoral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. During this time, a number of factors converged to make moral relativism appear plausible. Moral relativism is an important topic in metaethics. It is alsowidely discussed outside philosophy (for example, by political andreligious leaders), and it is controversial among philosophers andnonphilosophers alike.
Though many philosophers are quite critical of moralrelativism, there are several contemporary philosophers who defendforms of it.